[Dexter Singh]

Hello everyone. I have two ideas i want to share today.

Firstly I would like to start of with three typed monsters.
Three typed monsters that can have more than one elemental quality. eg A monster can have. Fire/Flying/Rock. instead of the lame old to typed ones.

Secondly I would like to state that there should be emoticons in chat.. like a simple smiley and :3 > , those type of things


That is all. Comment below ._. v down there.

[night phoenix]

Good ideas! I always wondered y monsters have flying novice and learn no flying moves, care to comment?

[ThePhantom]

what about a wind nature ? :3

[Dexter Singh]

random abilities are put by computers i think.. so thats y.

[night phoenix]

Ohhh, and wind=flying and a type I have in Drexles, see my thread.

[Dexter Singh]

what about a wind nature ? :3

im thinking about renaming the elements i have the names for some of them but elements like fire.. i cant get a rename so i quit that idea

[ShockZekrom]

Flame? Pyro?

[Dexter Singh]

thought of that.. i really hate to copy from yu-gi-oh too ._.

[ShockZekrom]

Skip Yu-Gi-Oh.
MONSTERS FTEFW
Oh, how 'bout burn?
Blaze?

[zacherymatthews]

https://forum.monstermmorpg.com/Thread-Type-renames check it :3

[Ramza_X]

Nice... but I don't approve the 3 types .-. Cuz imagine receiving 8x damage instead of 4x, like the combination of Fire, Rock, and Ground

[TheArtOfRuin]

I like the idea of having monsters with more than two types, but like Ramza said, the balancing issues with 8x damage would be ridiculous. It would probably also render some monsters nearly invincible depending on the combination of types they had.

[honchkrow14]

This was already suggested by me lol =D

[TheGreatGonsalez]

I dont agree with the first one for the same reason that is mentiond earlier.... but the one with smileys i agree with^^ and why cant we have capital letters whenever we want either?!

[SparrowHawk]

I disagree with monsters having 3 types. Some can have no weakness and monsters can already learn moves that aren't in their typing anyway.

Chat having emoticons.. Surely it has been suggested but whatever, I don't really care about it.

[Ghost]

I think 3 types is one type too many.
To me, 3 types is more of a disadvantage than a advantage.
Sure it would be able to 2x all its attack, but it's vulnerable to 4x weakness multiplied by 3. Meaning total chaos to strategic players.

[SkyRock]

and why cant we have capital letters whenever we want either?!

SO THAT WE CANNOT YEEEEEELL!!!!
/capsoff

[Ghost]

I think certain chat emoticons like "" "T^T" and "xD" should be auto capitalized. If it were, i'd totally be more chat active.

[SkyRock]

Yeah... chat shows :d b) t.t
Ruins a lot of good emotes.

[Henrie]

I really like the idea of a tri-typed monster. Three times weakness? There are only a few combinations that actually pull that nonsense off. As for no weaknesses, we already have monsters without weaknesses. Mostly with the aid of their abilities. My biggest question would be if the game engine is prepared to add a potential third type to monsters. It might not even be possible without a rewrite. Or it might be as simple as saying "type=***,***,***".

As many monsters as there are, this would give us a bit more variety. x'D

[Pokekar]

Not just three types, I think the monsters should have just one type and they can be able to fuse, just like 'digimon'. We can have millions of combinations; I will try to explain this in detail in near future!

[shadowananime]

pokar i dont think they want digimon but i belive that 3 type mons would be great but still there are some mon typeings that dont exsist yet any ways

[Night PhoeNICK'S]

we should have two type attacks though...

[War]

Flame? Pyro?

how about inferno.......

[Night PhoeNICK'S]

0_0 no fusions in monsters please! too much!

[simamars]

I agree!

[CeFurkan]

3 types interesting idea but hard to implement

i need to think about it