Poll: Do you think this is a good idea?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
No
Maybe
* You voted for this item.
Thread Rating:
2013-06-18, 08:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 2013-06-19, 07:29 PM by dreshawnstair.)
i was thinking of a map with all zeniths , ancients and legendaries only people with all 19 badges and has caught 1 of each monsters from regular to emmarsary and have one of each monster evolution and at least your rank got to be 200 and lower can enter but for me it would but i think some people would like it. It can be the last map of the game
please vote
yes or no or maybe
please vote
yes or no or maybe
2013-06-19, 12:57 AM
Normally I would shoot this idea down on the spot, but you gave so many restrictions that it could be plausible. Still, it would undermine the entire idea of legend/ancient hunting.
WHEN FIRST I APPEAR, I SEEM MYSTERIOUS! But when explained, I'm nothing serious. :3
Find me on deviantART, FanFiction, or YouTube!
Co-Composer of the Monster MMORPG Soundtrack
Find me on deviantART, FanFiction, or YouTube!
Co-Composer of the Monster MMORPG Soundtrack
2013-06-19, 02:19 AM
I voted no, because hunting rare mons is the end game. Making that easy kills the game. It would also destroy pvp and the game economy... and, in my opinion, more importantly it would completely negate "the thrill of the hunt."
2013-06-19, 10:32 AM
No , because you all wanna have ancients as quick as possible, that game isnt like pokemon.
I am kinda tired of these ideas with maps of ancients or higher the ancient appear rate.
Its fine like it is now , you will have to be patient and hunt long until you find it. Thats all , thank yo.
I am kinda tired of these ideas with maps of ancients or higher the ancient appear rate.
Its fine like it is now , you will have to be patient and hunt long until you find it. Thats all , thank yo.
This is the signature of Crobbywobby. Nothing more to say.
2013-06-19, 02:26 PM
Yes... i like the idea about a special map but NO maps with only zeniths and higher... that makes it all very very unfair.
2013-06-19, 04:40 PM
Hmm.. Eh.
It's always an interesting suggestion, though.
- 19 Badge Requirement - Always (:
- Caught 1,000 monsters?? Eh. Anyone can do that. There are several ways of just doing that. You can do that without even trying. Make it interesting like.. Catching 1 of every monster or so :/ Monsterdex can determine that.
- 1000 and lower.. Shouldn't the special map be hard to get so the game isn't spammed with all those Legends and Ancients?? I mean, it already is but make it a little more exclusive to get?
It's always an interesting suggestion, though.
2013-06-19, 06:11 PM
I think it would be a good event room for special occasions, but not last longer than a day, maybe an hour just to ensure the games economy isn't too jacked up.
Your life just got better.
You're welcome.
You're welcome.
2013-06-19, 06:54 PM
Double or triple the amount of monster fought and make it the top 100-200 ppl allowed and I go for it
"the greatest victory is that which requires no battle"
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
2013-06-19, 07:23 PM
i agree with all of you made a good point so i will choose No on my own idea but you guys can still vote and i would like what sparrow hawk said "This isnt like pokemon so ill change it
2013-06-19, 09:29 PM
I said nothing about pokemon though... e.e ?????????
2013-06-19, 10:07 PM
You could make a special map with a low percentage of finding Starters (E.G.)
Always wanted to be able to catch one..
Always wanted to be able to catch one..
In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems.
For issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same.
2013-06-20, 06:25 AM
there's gonna be no fun if ppl can get everything they want its kinda like that
2013-06-21, 11:54 AM
2013-06-22, 01:15 AM
.... .. o m g.
Monster MMORPG's first Kpop fan!
Back after more than 12 months of vacation.
2013-06-25, 01:25 PM
no. it would destroy the point of the game.
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Users browsed this thread: