[CeFurkan]

Alright people i am not really sure what kind of level ranges we should have. I am planning to increase maximum appear level on maps to the 72. So here the list. Comment on it.

zone 1: 1-12
zone 2: 12-17
zone 3: 17-25
zone 4: 25-32
zone 5: 32-35
zone 6: 35-37
zone 7: 37-41
zone 8: 41-45
zone 9: 45-47
zone 10: 47-50
zone 11: 50-54
zone 12: 54-56
zone 13: 56-59
zone 14: 59-61
zone 15: 61-64
zone 16: 64-67
zone 17: 67-69
zone 18: 69-71
zone 19: 71-72

[Pein]

I think zone 19 should be 71-75

[SkyRock]

I think zone 19 should be 71-75

Maybe even 75-80 at the last map with monsters?

And we need at least a few maps with 90+ levels... maybe another island at the very end?

[Ramza_X]

I think it should be:

zone 1: 1-15
zone 2: 15-20
zone 3: 20-24
zone 4: 24-29
zone 5: 29-32
zone 6: 32-35
zone 7: 35-39
zone 8: 39-42
zone 9: 42-45
zone 10: 45-50
zone 11: 50-54
zone 12: 54-56
zone 13: 56-59
zone 14: 59-61
zone 15: 61-64
zone 16: 64-66
zone 17: 66-68
zone 18: 68-70
zone 19: 70-72

---

I think zone 19 should be 71-75

Maybe even 75-80 at the last map with monsters?

And we need at least a few maps with 90+ levels... maybe another island at the very end?

I don't think he want to put a very high leveled zone... it'll be easier to level up and rack up gold.

[SkyRock]

Hmm, you're right ;-; I guess I was too power-hungry...
The lower the levels, the better.... 'cept of course when it goes too low...

[Dark.Zero]

I'm am thinking what level the ancient sages would be?

Also these level ranges at zone look fine to me

[staff vidyasagar]

they are all fine if we have lots of high lvl monsters every1 would have lots of gold making low game economy and it would be no fun if every1 could get high lvl monsters in no time every1 would have lots of powers totally no fun it would be

[Ramza_X]

they are all fine if we have lots of high lvl monsters every1 would have lots of gold making low game economy and it would be no fun if every1 could get high lvl monsters in no time every1 would have lots of powers totally no fun it would be

That's a paradox. The game would then have a higher economy.

But as staff said, and so did I, the level ranges shouldn't be TOO high, so I think 72 is... kinda high enough. We just need to agree on the range.

[staff vidyasagar]

oh my bad ramza on that area

[kunwarkharbanda]

well i think lvl must not be above 60 as it will lead to spam o high lvl mons though for me its real good

[Guider456]

well i think lvl must not be above 60 as it will lead to spam o high lvl mons though for me its real good

itll be hard to kill them those, since of the stat boosts and that, emissary zenith legend and especially ancient, if you manage to kill them the exp will be worth it.

and besides its hard grinding on level 60s, if someone beats all the npcs in 1 day(seems impossible i k but could happen) then how else will they train?

[night phoenix]

Support, then, have a map with 1 ultimate Monster, with a high appearance rate, but only accessible if all gym leaders beat, all monsters caught, etc. and a super low catch rate, ultimate boxes could totally fail.

[kunwarkharbanda]

well i think lvl must not be above 60 as it will lead to spam o high lvl mons though for me its real good

itll be hard to kill them those, since of the stat boosts and that, emissary zenith legend and especially ancient, if you manage to kill them the exp will be worth it.

and besides its hard grinding on level 60s, if someone beats all the npcs in 1 day(seems impossible i k but could happen) then how else will they train?

legend hunting is still an option and didn't understand 2nd para

[Guider456]

1.yes it's still an option, but its harder to find them with the 93.33% run thing, the higher level would help balance it out.

2. 520 maps...and if there are lets say...5 npcs on each map... thats 2600 npcs, so yeah even though it seems impossible it could happen.

3. it would encourage the use of health items against npcs and wild monsters, since they were hardly used before ,with this new system people will have to use them a whole lot more.

[Viperianw]

i think the levels are high enough as it is...
looks good

[fjkulit]

No. Just no. Highest level should be flat 70
The bonuses are high enough

[SparrowHawk]

I'm fine with it No arguments.

1.yes it's still an option, but its harder to find them with the 93.33% run thing, the higher level would help balance it out.

2. 520 maps...and if there are lets say...5 npcs on each map... thats 2600 npcs, so yeah even though it seems impossible it could happen.

3. it would encourage the use of health items against npcs and wild monsters, since they were hardly used before ,with this new system people will have to use them a whole lot more.

Sounds good.

[mike521]

Your zone level ranges look great, cefurkan; they may seem levels may seem low to the lower zones, but even at a low level your new monster system makes any wild battles with a monster difficult, great job Cefurkan.

[Char02]

Looks good to me. Does anyone know if the Ancients will be catchable at lower levels as well? Or will they only be catchable at the higher levels and/or upon completing certain arenas?

[fjkulit]

higher levels, char

[orboknown]

fine as is imo.

[CeFurkan]

Looks good to me. Does anyone know if the Ancients will be catchable at lower levels as well? Or will they only be catchable at the higher levels and/or upon completing certain arenas?

will be available also at lower levels. i will try to assign monsters as much as possible to their related zones

of course zones won't be totally composed by zone type but also contain other type monsters

but majorly from that zone type monsters

[Quanto_Konami]

The levels are fine...and what with how many maps there are...and the new boosts that the wild monsters will have...it will be awhile before any but the top .25% or so make it to the last couple zones