[Guider456]

This is how I believe it should go:



Different Monster Count : 2.0

Ancient Gem Count : 1.5

Different Monster Count Average Level: 1.5

Different Monster Count Average Exp: 1.0

Different Monster Count Total Exp: 1.0

Legendary Monster Count : 0.5

User Money : 0.25



I know you're all probably thinking (You just did that so you have a major advantage), but think about it in this sense. Role-play wise, would you rank a trainer higher that has an awesome 6 monster team and tons of gold, or would you rank higher a trainer who had 50 monsters at level 100 and not that much gold?



I don't think money should have much to do with top trainer rank, it's not about how rich you are, it's about how awesome your monsters are. I already know, because of the way this game ranking is currently set up, that even if I get all 659/659 to 100 I will probably not even be in the top 5 because of Average Exp and User Money. That is... sad, to me. That I could get 659 monsters of a different name to level 100, and NOT be considered one of the top 5. This is why I believe that Average Level, Average Exp, and Total Exp should only be counted towards a monster of the same name ONCE. So if you have 50 miro, it only counts one of those in the ranking. You may say that's unfair to the player who spent all that time catching 50 miro and leveling them to 100, but at the same time.... Does it really say you are the best trainer just because you can sit in Outpost Island catching Miro all day long?

by this " Different Monster Count Average Level: 1.5 "



You mean different monster count * AVG level (of all monsters) ?

It seems like logical



we can do that way i suppose

I just mean that for Average Level, Average Exp, and Total exp, it should only count the Different Monster's, it shouldn't be all monsters. So, it should only count a monster of a single name once, not 50 times if you have 50 of them.



For example, if you have 5 Alaclipse at level 100, it would only count one of those towards total exp, average level, and average exp. However, also, if you have 5 alaclipse but only one of them is at level 100, the level 100 one would be the only one counted and the other 4 wouldn't affect your rank.



But, anything that would put more of an emphasis on different monster count would be awesome, because the main point should be to catch all the monsters.

which you can't do since not all of them are catchable lol