2011-09-14, 11:39 PM
I'm sure this has been brought up several times already, but this issue needs to be attended to in a serious manner. As you all know, reputation points are certain points that can be positive, negative, or neutral, and they are usually given to a user when he/she has done something that appealed to the reputation giver, in the case of a positive point, something that the reputation giver did not find good, in the case of a negative point, or something that the reputation giver found just fine or something, in the case of a neutral point. Neutral points are also handed out to users who are just "cool" to the reputation giver (or something like that).
Ever since the introduction of the whole system of reputation points, I have picked up on many problems concerning the system. Firstly, some users have found a way to abuse the system, creating alternate accounts and using those alternate accounts to give their main account a large amount of positive reputation points. This makes the user seem to be a nice, reputable user when he/she may not be so. Next, some users have been giving staff members positive reputation points to "kiss up" to the staff member and so they could be the staff member's "best buddy." This is absolutely unacceptable as it just makes the whole system of giving users positive reputation points into a race to see how many staff members a user can get on his/her "side." However, it's not just the positive reputation points that are being abused. Negative reputation points are being used in inappropriate ways as well. For example, some users think that instead of talking to a user who may have angered them to solve the dispute they should just spam the user who angered them with negative reputation points as they feel fit. This is not appropriate at all, as it completely defeats the whole purpose of negative reputation points. Negative reputation points are to be used when a user has been posting posts of poor quality frequently, or when a user is acting in an inappropriate way on the forums. Giving a user negative reputation points just because he/she is "your enemy" or whatever is completely unacceptable.
I have refrained from giving out specific examples of the scenarios I described above, so I could avoid any problems with any users. However, I would like to show this screenshot of the Most Reputed Members, which can be seen from the forum index:
![[Image: jIbMI.png]](https://i.imgur.com/jIbMI.png)
Seriously guys? This is not cool at all. As you can see, more than half of the list is dominated by staff members, which shows that users are giving them reputation points just for the heck of it, not because they are necessarily good on the forums.
There are clearly many issues with the current reputation system, and I do not foresee them being fixed anytime soon. Therefore, I believe that the whole system should be removed. It definitely is having a larger negative effect than positive on the community.
Thank you for considering my suggestion.
Edit: Thanks orboknown for making a poll!
Supporters
Ever since the introduction of the whole system of reputation points, I have picked up on many problems concerning the system. Firstly, some users have found a way to abuse the system, creating alternate accounts and using those alternate accounts to give their main account a large amount of positive reputation points. This makes the user seem to be a nice, reputable user when he/she may not be so. Next, some users have been giving staff members positive reputation points to "kiss up" to the staff member and so they could be the staff member's "best buddy." This is absolutely unacceptable as it just makes the whole system of giving users positive reputation points into a race to see how many staff members a user can get on his/her "side." However, it's not just the positive reputation points that are being abused. Negative reputation points are being used in inappropriate ways as well. For example, some users think that instead of talking to a user who may have angered them to solve the dispute they should just spam the user who angered them with negative reputation points as they feel fit. This is not appropriate at all, as it completely defeats the whole purpose of negative reputation points. Negative reputation points are to be used when a user has been posting posts of poor quality frequently, or when a user is acting in an inappropriate way on the forums. Giving a user negative reputation points just because he/she is "your enemy" or whatever is completely unacceptable.
I have refrained from giving out specific examples of the scenarios I described above, so I could avoid any problems with any users. However, I would like to show this screenshot of the Most Reputed Members, which can be seen from the forum index:
![[Image: jIbMI.png]](https://i.imgur.com/jIbMI.png)
Seriously guys? This is not cool at all. As you can see, more than half of the list is dominated by staff members, which shows that users are giving them reputation points just for the heck of it, not because they are necessarily good on the forums.
There are clearly many issues with the current reputation system, and I do not foresee them being fixed anytime soon. Therefore, I believe that the whole system should be removed. It definitely is having a larger negative effect than positive on the community.
Thank you for considering my suggestion.
Edit: Thanks orboknown for making a poll!
Supporters
- orboknown
- Nitz_X
- ItsHowIRoll
- Misdreavus
- Dark_Flamez
- Ghost