Post Reply  Subscribed Users 0
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
CeFurkan Offline
Administrator - Owner
******
Administrators

Posts: 3,377
Thanks Given: 382
Thanks Received: 358 in 241 posts
Joined: May 2011
Post: #1
Heart Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace with them

These are new non-comissioned monsters

I want to add them to game with replacing our bad monsters images

So anything that is below their quality can be replaced

And do any of them violates any copyrights ?

Please post your messages as

For example

Replace : #1342 Puphan  with Dietoxin


Waiting your answers thanks a lot. I will make update and it depends on how fast we will select which monsters to replace Big Grin

http://forum.monstermmorpg.com/attachment.php?aid=494


[Image: attachment.php?aid=494]


Attached File(s) Thumbnail(s)
   
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2013 12:53 AM by CeFurkan.)
12-21-2013 12:52 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Alduin
Unregistered

 
Post: #2
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
None of them look to be copied so you should be good on the Copyright issue.. As far as what to replace I've no clue.. Superiors, and regulars I suppose though. Sad, would much prefer to see Emi's being redrawn and or replaced, but the art here is very plain, Imo.
12-21-2013 12:58 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Santy Offline
Art Designer
******
Art Designer

Posts: 425
Thanks Given: 611
Thanks Received: 143 in 114 posts
Joined: Jul 2013
Post: #3
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
I don't know if I'm a big help here, but none of them looks to much like another monster/pokemon to me.

I just like them all 
(slash, fennekore, dunesprite, catertres and the other monsters with the skulls are really cool = my opinion)
            thx PRYSMA 2
  [Image: 7G5XCZU.jpg]
12-21-2013 12:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Juan Of A Kind Offline
Trainee Member

Posts: 1
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Joined: Dec 2013
Post: #4
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Charas, Goldon and Marroslash should be replaced, in my opinion.
12-21-2013 12:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
SkyRock Offline
Super Moderator
******
Super Moderators

Posts: 2,145
Thanks Given: 26
Thanks Received: 118 in 109 posts
Joined: May 2011
Post: #5
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Chestip bears similarities to Chespin, name and art. Then again, who wouldn't copy Chespin? <3
[Image: Mayuri%20Signature_zps5xrqr7ck.png]
12-21-2013 01:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Arlaxeon Offline
Donator
*****
Donator

Posts: 453
Thanks Given: 5
Thanks Received: 33 in 31 posts
Joined: Feb 2013
Post: #6
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Cefurkan, if you have played pokemon you should know that:

Chestip = Chespin like (+name)
Charas = Charizard + Lapras like
Fennekore = Fennekin like (+name)

Also one not so important one:

Venodactyl has a venonat/butterfree head.

I wonder why people like Santy and Alduin didnt see any of these...

--------------------------------

*NOTE - Marroslash might look like sandslash + marowak but its fine imo.
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2013 01:52 AM by Arlaxeon.)
12-21-2013 01:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
CeFurkan Offline
Administrator - Owner
******
Administrators

Posts: 3,377
Thanks Given: 382
Thanks Received: 358 in 241 posts
Joined: May 2011
Post: #7
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
(12-21-2013 01:50 AM)Arlaxeon Wrote:  Cefurkan, if you have played pokemon you should know that:

Chestip = Chespin like (+name)
Charas = Charizard + Lapras like
Fennekore = Fennekin like (+name)

Also one not so important one:

Venodactyl has a venonat/butterfree head.

I wonder why people like Santy and Alduin didnt see any of these...

--------------------------------

*NOTE - Marroslash might look like sandslash + marowak but its fine imo.

names not important we can change
Yes it may have head but i think it should be fine


the question is replace them with which of our existing monsters Big Grin
12-21-2013 01:59 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Arlaxeon Offline
Donator
*****
Donator

Posts: 453
Thanks Given: 5
Thanks Received: 33 in 31 posts
Joined: Feb 2013
Post: #8
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Imo

http://www.monstermmorpg.com/Brutone-Monster-Dex-414 Brutone

for Goldon.

If possible (Because theres 2 in the evo line)
12-21-2013 02:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Alduin
Unregistered

 
Post: #9
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Because those names aren't copyrighted.
12-21-2013 02:58 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Arlaxeon Offline
Donator
*****
Donator

Posts: 453
Thanks Given: 5
Thanks Received: 33 in 31 posts
Joined: Feb 2013
Post: #10
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
*Sidenote for if you didn't understand - With charas, chestip and fennekore i meant the sprites look a lot like the actual pokemon... not just the names look like eachother...

*Not too important cuz probably not many will notice or be bothered but:

Omapix = Omanyte name and sprite + Vulpix name and sprite

Tongue
12-21-2013 03:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Alduin
Unregistered

 
Post: #11
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
I see the resemblance, but it isn't a striking similarity.
12-21-2013 03:53 AM
Quote this message in a reply
SparrowHawk Offline
Super Moderator
******
Super Moderators

Posts: 5,180
Thanks Given: 45
Thanks Received: 104 in 88 posts
Joined: May 2011
Post: #12
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
They are all fine.
I'd suggest a name change for Chestip at least, it's too close to Chespin.
12-21-2013 03:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Night PhoeNICK'S Offline
Monster Fighter
***

Posts: 125
Thanks Given: 11
Thanks Received: 23 in 22 posts
Joined: Nov 2013
Post: #13
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
dont take this the wrong way, but these monsters dont belong here . im not saying theyre bad. BUT were BETTER than pokemon right? (seriously im asking cuz these monsters and other things in this game have made me think otherwise.) SO lets get....ORGINAL IDEAS! GASP IK!
[Image: Page%202.png]
BEHOLD! THE DREXLE GOLEM TITAN!
12-21-2013 04:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Char02 Offline
Super Donator
******
Super Donator

Posts: 162
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 46 in 20 posts
Joined: May 2011
Post: #14
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Ok, here goes...

Capty = Chibee (#965), Emissary
Cryle = Elekra (#966), Emissary
Catertres = Rooleaf (#1277), Regular
Charas = Pistawn (#1308), Emissary
Chestip = Picmol (#1204), Regular
Crystaleon = Moniterra (#1407), Superior
Cunair = Mukia (#1556), Emissary
Diebenzo = Glum (#1085)
Dietoxin = Noosis (#1086)
Dunesprite = Curleaf (#1309), Superior
Fennekore = Pongulf (#1281), Superior
Goldon = Draground (#898), Emissary
Incutty = Snowtis (#1759), Superior
Harbator = Snowfight (#1760), Superior
Ivylithe = Errtrest (#1705), Superior
Lyrox = Orgoul (#1761), Emissary
Marroslash = Boulderollo (#1290), Emissary
Omapix = Shiwiz (#287), Regular
Raitigas = Rendr (#1763), Emissary
Seeysaur = Griin (#1703), Regular
Venodactyl = Phamtomet (#1707), Superior

I tried to not mess up any current evolution lines.
[Image: 2vru43d.jpg]
12-21-2013 06:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users say Thank You to Char02 for this post:
(12-21-2013), Lolzinator (12-21-2013)
Alduin
Unregistered

 
Post: #15
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
(12-21-2013 06:04 AM)Char02 Wrote:  Ok, here goes...

Capty = Chibee (#965), Emissary
Cryle = Elekra (#966), Emissary
Catertres = Rooleaf (#1277), Regular
Charas = Pistawn (#1308), Emissary
Chestip = Picmol (#1204), Regular
Crystaleon = Moniterra (#1407), Superior
Cunair = Mukia (#1556), Emissary
Diebenzo = Glum (#1085)
Dietoxin = Noosis (#1086)
Dunesprite = Curleaf (#1309), Superior
Fennekore = Pongulf (#1281), Superior
Goldon = Draground (#898), Emissary
Incutty = Snowtis (#1759), Superior
Harbator = Snowfight (#1760), Superior
Ivylithe = Errtrest (#1705), Superior
Lyrox = Orgoul (#1761), Emissary
Marroslash = Boulderollo (#1290), Emissary
Omapix = Shiwiz (#287), Regular
Raitigas = Rendr (#1763), Emissary
Seeysaur = Griin (#1703), Regular
Venodactyl = Phamtomet (#1707), Superior

I tried to not mess up any current evolution lines.

I agree with this message.
12-21-2013 06:28 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Lolzinator Offline
Extreme Donator
******
Extreme Donator

Posts: 976
Thanks Given: 46
Thanks Received: 62 in 53 posts
Joined: Jun 2011
Post: #16
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
looks like most of them are just pokemon fusing.. hahah idk, they are really close to be pokemons..

agree with char btw.
[Image: viking.png]

The Vikings Will Rampage.
12-21-2013 06:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
PupK9 Offline
Extreme Donator
******
Extreme Donator

Posts: 608
Thanks Given: 59
Thanks Received: 59 in 52 posts
Joined: Jun 2013
Post: #17
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Marroslash looks a lot like sandshrew.
I'm baaaaaaaack
12-21-2013 07:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
CeFurkan Offline
Administrator - Owner
******
Administrators

Posts: 3,377
Thanks Given: 382
Thanks Received: 358 in 241 posts
Joined: May 2011
Post: #18
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
ok guys tell me new names for those fusions

and char02 pm me in game u got full uv any nature zenith reward Big Grin
12-21-2013 08:29 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Henrie Offline
Art Designer
******
Art Designer

Posts: 570
Thanks Given: 13
Thanks Received: 63 in 40 posts
Joined: Jan 2012
Post: #19
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
Wow Char, nailed it.  XD

Seeysaur strikes me as an odd one out.  Not because it's a Seel/Ivysaur hybrid, but because he has a lolipop.  ...I want that lolipop.

Chestip is different enough to be safe, but what if we color-shifted him to blue and made him a water type to avoid conflict alltogether?  He'd make a pretty good Dragnarr ( http://www.monstermmorpg.com/Dragnarr-Monster-Dex-1311 ) if he were blue, lol.
[Image: MightyenaSig.png]
(This post was last modified: 12-22-2013 11:20 AM by Henrie.)
12-21-2013 04:54 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Lolzinator Offline
Extreme Donator
******
Extreme Donator

Posts: 976
Thanks Given: 46
Thanks Received: 62 in 53 posts
Joined: Jun 2011
Post: #20
RE: Do any of these monsters violate any copyrights and which monsters should we replace
(12-21-2013 04:54 PM)Henrie Wrote:  Wow Char, nailed it.  XD

Seeysaur strikes me as an odd one out.  Not because it's a Seel/Ivysaur hybrid, but because he has a lolipop.  ...I want that lolipop.

Chestip is different enough to be safe, but what if we color-shifted him to blue and made him a water type to avoid conflict alltogether?  He'd make a pretty good Dragnarr (http://www.monstermmorpg.com/Dragnarr-Monster-Dex-1311) if he were blue, lol.


agree with Henrie on Chestip, color change.
[Image: viking.png]

The Vikings Will Rampage.
12-21-2013 10:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply  Subscribed Users 0


Who read this thread?
32 User(s) read this thread:
CeFurkan, SparrowHawk, Char02, SkyRock, garez123321, Ghost, Lolzinator, heatshot, Dark.Zero, PcKaveman, Ursa015, Kai_Sr, Henrie, Cabintom, Snes, Zerion, Cpt. Obvious, Ashenator, Surgate, flareshark08, Arlaxeon, prayudi, lekad, PupK9, rech, ch17175, bigdawg, Qurac23, Santy, shoukosumeragi, OkciotS, warsystem04

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)